Reply to Post 46738 by lazarus in song writing
All this again underlines the point that you should just do what works for you.
Absolutely. Here is my previous post with a few things I've tried (not hard fast rules, just some suggestions):
I think structure and arrangement are massively important and often-neglected areas of songwriting. I try to put myself in the position of the listener, from start to finish. A song often needs to gain momentum (depending on the type of song - this won't necessarily apply to all genres, but for 'mainstream' rock/pop some of the methods listed below are fairly commonplace I think). These are some things I think can help make (and keep) a song interesting throughout:
- instant vocal entry (best used sparingly) or brief introduction followed by vocals. This grabs the listeners' attention rather than bore them with a minute of needless guitar widdling. Worked wonders for The Beatles and their ilk.
- bare minimum of repetitions (if a verse only needs 8 bars, don't make it 24 because you like it - people will go to the bar when you play it)
- relatively minimal harmony within an opening verse, followed by denser subsequent verses (can also be applied to choruses, although both sound better when subtle in my opinion)
- subtle time signature changes make a predictable song far more interesting (try cutting off a beat or two at the end of the second chorus for example - you could be surprised how much better the song sounds for little details like this)
- a tight, definite ending (too many bands neglect the end of a song)
- shrewd use of instrumentation (including range and dynamics). For example, so many 'rock' bands pile layer upon layer of distorted guitars into their songs, and it just sounds messy. Less is almost always more in song writing.
Simple things, but I find they all make a big difference when used together. I think music's biggest enemies are ego and complacency; if you take your time and really think about the sounds you're making, it will show.